>>More Guides
>>More on this book
>>Order this book

About the Author

Frances Sherwood is the author of Vindication, a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award. She lives in South Bend, Indiana.
 

The Lost Garden
Reading Group Guide


From the Author | Discussion Questions

 

From the Author

The Book of Splendor is a love story. It is my unabashed love affair with the great city of Prague, my grudging affection for the irascible, mad Emperor Rudolph II, and my great admiration for Rabbi Judah Ben Lowe. Rochel, the orphaned seamstress, is both my new baby child and my ancestral mother. Is there a greater love?

I was fortunate enough to be in Prague while teaching at a writing conference in the glorious summer of 1995, again when I attended a conference on alchemy (yes, alchemy), and a third time to snoop around, checking streets, poking my head into open doorways. It was amazing to be in a picture-perfect city hundreds and hundreds of years old with gold leaf on the buildings, a castle, an astronomical clock, towers, ramparts, and a great bridge over the Vlatava River. It is a city with ghosts and legends, puppets, green absinthe, and young women in short, red skirts who kiss their boyfriends on the trolley car. It is a city that is coming alive after the long Nazi and Soviet occupations. My grandmother's relatives lived there until they were killed in Auschwitz. I am attached.

When I was in Prague for the alchemy conference, I was lucky enough to attend an exhibit up at the castle (not only Rudolph's castle but also Kafka's and Vaclav Havel's) of artifacts of the period of Rudolph II. Wow! What a treat! I saw the emperor's vast collection of clocks encrusted with jewels. He was obsessed with gold and time. I saw the clothes he was buried in, his alchemical laboratory with mysterious flasks and vessels, precious toys of the period, odd musical instruments, his pure agate bowl, his mandrake root in the shape of a man, and his unrivaled art collection.

To read about the rabbi was to be in the company of a saint, and there are legends galore about that amazing man, some of which I included in my book.

I have embellished freely on the golem legend, made him good-looking, smart, personable, why not?

Rochel is pure invention, but good with the needle like my mother; and like my grandfather, she comes from a small village near Kiev. She is in some ways a Cinderella figure, but she goes through the oven, emerges like the phoenix from the ashes. She stands in homage.

I read a lot for The Book of Splendor. What particularly interested me were books about the history of opium, tulips, coffee, food, clothing, bathrooms, architecture, fairy tales, art, money, exploration, popular culture.

For me, writing is a process of discovery, an opportunity to live in another world for a while, to make the acquaintance of different times, to literarily make a circle of friends, to fall in love, to stay in love.  

Discussion Questions 

1. The Book of Splendor defies category: it's part fairy tale, part historical account, part comedy of manners, and then some. How does Frances Sherwood's style of storytelling manage to harmonize so many different literary genres? How do the different genres bear on one another to tell a richer story?

2. The book is replete with historical anecdotes, meticulously researched and lavishly detailed. Yet Sherwood uses history as an inspirational departure point for her own fictional creations, playing liberally with historical fact and abandoning it at will. In doing so, what does she reveal about the interplay of fact and fiction in literature?

3. Judenstadt is brought to life in Sherwood's writing as a dank, dark ghetto densely populated by a poor but tight-knit community of equals. In contrast, the court of Emperor Rudolf II is described as a palace of incomparable opulence and psychic disorder. How does Sherwood's language capture these opposing environments?

4. In the novel's opening, Sherwood writes: "A golem is, at best, a God-send, at worst blasphemy incarnate . . . marked by a lack of intelligence, described frequently and without charity as a doltish slave at his master's command." Yet Sherwood's Yossel is handsome and compassionate, grander in thought and feeling than many of the natural-born humans in her story. Why do you think Sherwood decided to deviate from the standards of the myth? What possibly compelled her to rewrite this well-known myth of Jewish culture?

5. In his love for Rochel, Yossel proves that, despite his origins, he is not purely a monster. Though he can't articulate them verbally, what spiritual questions does he seem to ask himself in demonstration of his humanity?

6. Describe the relationship between Rochel and Yossel versus that between Rochel and the tailor Zev. What are the different dimensions of love demonstrated in Rochel's feelings for each?

7. Rochel's illegitimate birth and Christian blood make her an outsider in Judenstadt. How else is she unlike the women of Judenstadt?

8. The myriad characters of Rudolph II's court—from Tycho Brahe to John Dee to Kirakos—present the vast power, both political and cultural, of the Hapsburg empire in 1601. Describe the individual members of the court and what each represents in Sherwood's historical portrait.

9. How does Sherwood's sympathetic portrayal of Václav allow us more insight into the character of Rudolph II, showing him to be more than the caricature of a selfish despot?

10. Comment on the meaning of the imagery of gold throughout the novel.

11. The parallel stories of the persecution of Prague's Jewish community and Rudolph II's insane quest for immortality stand in stark contrast to one another, yet their collision brings about the novel's highly dramatic and epic conclusion. What themes do these stories share in common?

12. A common spirituality unites Prague's Jewish community, and even brings Rabbi Loew his store of magical powers. Rudolph II's court has ambitious astronomers and alchemists, but it lacks any moral center or sense of camaraderie. What is Sherwood suggesting here about the nature of spirituality?