Welcome to Social Psychology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Homepage
Chapter Outlines
Chapter Reviews
Flashcards
Diagnostic Quizzes
Apply It! Exercises
Resource Links

The Norton Psychology Labs



Chapter 2

  1. Human beings, like all large primates except the orangutan, are group-living animals who influence and must get along with others.


  2. The presence of other people sometimes facilitates human performance and sometimes hinders it, but in predictable ways. Research in the area of social facilitation has shown that the presence of others is arousing, and that arousal increases people's tendencies to do what they are already predisposed to do. On easy tasks, people are predisposed to respond correctly, and so increasing this tendency facilitates performance. In contrast, on novel or difficult tasks, people are not predisposed to respond correctly, and so arousal hinders performance by making it more likely that they will respond incorrectly.


  3. A number of clever experiments have indicated that it is the mere presence of others that leads to social facilitation effects, although other factors, including evaluation apprehension, can intensify them. Moreover, distraction-conflict theory explains social facilitation by noting that awareness of another person can distract an individual and create a conflict between attending to the other person and to the task at hand, a conflict that is itself arousing.


  4. Social loafing is the tendency to exert less effort on a group task when individual contributions cannot be monitored.


  5. There is a tendency for large groups of people to sometimes transform into unruly mobs. This may happen because the anonymity and diffusion of responsibility that are often felt in large groups can lead to a mental state of deindividuation in which one is less concerned with the future, with normal societal constraints on behavior, and with the consequences of one's actions.


  6. The deindividuated state of "getting lost in the crowd" stands in marked contrast to how people normally feel, which is quite individually identifiable. Self-awareness theory maintains that focusing attention on the self will lead to individuation and, in turn, careful deliberation and concern with how well one's actions conform to internal moral standards.


  7. Most people overestimate how much they personally stand out and are identifiable to others, a phenomenon known as the spotlight effect.


  8. Groupthink is the tendency for members of cohesive groups to deal with the stress of making highly consequential decisions by pursuing consensus more vigorously than a critical analysis of all available information. Groupthink has been implicated in the faulty decision making that has led to a number of policy fiascos.


  9. Group decision making is affected by how cohesive a group is, how directive its leader is, and ingroup pressures that can lead to self-censorship, or the tendency for people to refrain from expressing their true feelings or reservations in the face of apparent consensus on the part of the other group members.
  10. Exchanging views with fellow group members can lead to more extreme decisions and make people more extreme in their attitudes. When groups make riskier decisions than individuals, the risky shift has occurred.


  11. Group discussion tends to create group polarization, whereby initial leanings in a risky direction tend to be made more risky by discussion and initial leanings in a conservative direction tend to be made more conservative.


  12. Group polarization is produced through persuasive arguments, in that a larger pool of information and arguments are made available to all group members. It is also produced through social comparison.


  13. People from cultures that place a high value on risk are more likely to make risky decisions after group discussion than people from cultures that do not value risk as highly.


  14. Polarization is a particularly common outcome in homogeneous groups, something we noted may be a particular problem in the modern world, as people are likely to read newspapers and watch news programs that fit their preexisting views. This polarization may be further reinforced through communication on the Internet, which makes it increasingly easy for people to exchange information solely with those who share their opinions.