|
>> Hemispheric Interactions and Aging
 |
Interview with Patricia Reuter-Lorenz, University of Michigan
From
Studying The Mind, VHS © 2003,
W. W. Norton
|
 |
 |
What role does the corpus callosum play in
normal brain function?
You can almost think of the corpus callosum as being a route
by which a copy of information that arrives in one hemisphere
is related to the other hemisphere. And because it's a copy
there may in fact be some degradation or compromise in the
signal when it has to be transferred across the corpus callosum.
And this has been one of the mechanisms that's been used
to explain visual laterality effects in normal subjects.
So, for instance, you might find that normal young individuals
are better at making a lexical decision such as deciding
whether a string is a word or not a word when it's presented
to the right visual field, left hemisphere as opposed to
the left visual field, right hemisphere. And the explanation
for this is that in the case of right hemisphere presentation
the information has to be transferred, which degrades quality.
So you'll get better performance when you present the word
directly to the left hemisphere.
The corpus callosum undoubtedly does a lot more than just
transfer information. It is critical to attentional functioning.
And so if we think about different aspects of attention,
the corpus callosum probably serves as an insulating function.
That is, operations that take place within neurosystems that
are lateralized to one hemisphere can occur somewhat independently
from those in the other hemisphere. This may be particularly
advantageous developmentally and in certain stages in the
life cycle. It also may serve to increase the neurocomputational
power of the hemispheres. So, for example, in split brain
patients you have an opportunity to study the specialization
of each hemisphere. And, remarkably, many functions studied,
in fact, are represented to some extent in both hemispheres.
It's rare that you will find that one hemisphere can do something
and the other hemisphere can't do it at all. So there is
some degree of competence across many, many domains bilaterally.
What this means, then, is that if you can harness that bilateral
competence—and there may be situations in which you
have to–then the corpus callosum actually becomes a
structure that allows for the recruitment of resources when
the going gets rough. And we think that this relates back
to aging, and it may help to explain why older adults tend
to show bilateral activation at levels of task difficulty
where young adults can still get away with just using a single
hemisphere.
How do working memory and attention functions differ in
young and older adults?
The work that I've done on aging has focused primarily on
two broad age groups, younger adults who range in age from
18 to 28 years, and older adults who are between the ages
of 62 and 75. We compared two different types of working
memory that are well-lateralized in young adults—verbal
working memory and spatial working memory. Our initial question
focused on the task demands within working memory—in
other words, if we were to make the task more challenging,
would we begin to see age differences that weren't there
in the less challenging tasks?
To our surprise, the aging effects were really robust on
the less challenging tasks. And what's exciting about using
neuroimaging to study ageing effects is that we could see
changes in the brain that are not evident in performance.
So in the verbal task in young adults we found left lateralized
activity in a circuit that includes frontal, parietal, several
different regions of frontal cortex, and pre-motor cortex.
And each of these areas has been associated with a different
aspect of working memory, to include rehearsal and storage
of information. In older adults we found activation in those
same sites, but we also found activation in homologous sites
within the right hemisphere. And we found these differences
between age groups to be primarily limited to frontal activation
differences, with older adults showing bilateral activity,
and younger adults showing left lateralized activity.
It became obvious that it was really important to see whether
this was just a verbal thing or whether we would find a complementary
result in the spatial domain. So we did the next study which
compared spatial working memory performance (memory for locations
across a three-second interval), and there we found right
frontal activation in the young adults in addition to other
sites as well, and the older adults again showed bilateral
activation. And that I think captures the main phenomena
that we and others are trying to understand. |