|
>>Studying
Explicit and Implicit Beliefs
It does not take a PhD to know that people can say one
thing and then do another. It does take a PhD, however,
to demonstrate that people can say that they honestly believe
one thing, when, in fact, unknown even to them, they harbor
ideas to the contrary. Professor Mahzarin Banaji at Harvard
and colleagues Brian Nosek of Yale and Anthony Greenwald
of Washington University have spent years trying to separate
and define the hidden and often unconscious beliefs underlying
prejudice. Perhaps we all harbor some stereotypes: women
make better councilors than men; Asians have a talent for
math; Italians have fiery tempers and are innately romantic.
Despite knowing individuals whose talents and personalities
run contrary to stereotypes, we persist in maintaining these
prejudices.
Banaji and her colleagues did not attempt to prove that people
could hold prejudices or opinions that are not supported by
experience. Instead, they sought to show that people could
hold these beliefs without awareness, and that their actions
could be influenced by these beliefs. These unconscious beliefs
are known as implicit attitudes. To test their hypotheses,
Banaji and her colleagues devised the Implicit Association
Task (IAT). This test, referenced in the opening vignette
of Chapter 1, was developed to measure attitudes or beliefs
that people may hold without conscious awareness. In this
activity, you have the opportunity to self-administer the
IAT. To do so, you should be in a quiet place and be able
to work without interruption for about ten minutes.
If you are ready to begin, click on the link below. Read
the instructions for the IAT and then choose to take the race-based
IAT. After you are finished taking the IAT, return to this
page for discussion.
Can a person hold attitudes and beliefs without being consciously
aware of them? If so, will those unconscious attitudes influence
behavior? The evidence clearly suggests that the answer is
yes. The IAT has been administered to about 1.5 million individuals,
and the data suggests that for most of us, implicit attitudes
towards race, age, or sex can influence our behavior.
What does it mean if your IAT results indicate a preference
for White , yet you don't consider yourself to be a prejudiced
individual? This is a very important question, and there are
a couple of good reasons why you should not jump to the conclusion
that you are prejudiced. The first is that the IAT is not
perfect ; you might want to take it several times to see if
you get the same results each time. The second reason speaks
to the definition of prejudice itself. When social psychologists
use the word "prejudice," they refer to a willingness
to hold negative beliefs or to act negatively towards an out-group
in our society. If you are a person who does not approve of
discrimination and would not knowingly act in such a fashion,
then you are not prejudiced.
Discussion Questions:
Web Links:
If you found this activity thought provoking, return to your
text and reread the section on implicit attitudes. Use the
Web
to continue your discovery. To read more about the interpretation
of the IAT, go to the
FAQ page for the IAT.
A brief but informative article about Professor Banaji that
was originally printed in the Harvard Gazette can be found
at www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2002/04.18/03-banaji.html.
Online copies of Professor Banaji's published papers and
additional information about this fascinating research is
available from www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~banaji
Primary Resources:
Greenwald, A. G. and M. R. Banaji, "Implicit social cognition:
Attitudes, self-esteem and cognition," Psychological Review
102 (1995): 4-27.
Phelps, E. A., K. J. O'Connor, W. A. Cunningham, E. S. Funayama,
J. C. Gatenby, J. C. Gore, and M. R. Banaji, "Performance
on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala
activation," 12(5) (2000): 729-38.
|