fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Addicted Brain Changes
New research is overturning previous thoughts about how addiction permanently changes the brain. Researchers hope these new insights might lead to new ways of treating addicts.
Interviewee: Christopher Cowan, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center
Copyright © ScienCentral, Inc.
Our brain is an ever-changing biological system. This video shows that addiction to drugs is associated with substantial changes to the wiring of the brain. Tiny branches on neurons called spines increase in number when we become addicted. That is a fact, but the research questions ask why they increase and what do they do.
|
1. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d You didn’t read about “spines” in your textbook, but spines are tiny branches from much larger branches that make up the portion of the neuron that receives messages from other neurons. Consider the four structural regions of the neuron. Which one of these do you think grows spines to increase its receptive field? |
|
2. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d The video explains that early researchers saw that an increase in use of addictive drugs was associated with an increase in the number of these spines. In technical terms, there was a positive correlation between number of spines and amount of drug usage. They concluded that the spines must cause addictions. What did you learn about correlation and causality that might apply to this study? |
|
3. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d This study is a great example of experimental reasoning, though it is a little difficult to sort out at first. Here are the facts:
a. Cocaine use reduces the amount of the protein.
b. The protein inhibits formation of spines.
Therefore: More cocaine => less protein => more spines.
Hypothesis: The protein is the common cause of addiction and spine formation.
If this hypothesis is correct, then if you increase the amount of the protein:
- Fewer spines should form.
- Addictive behaviors should decrease.
So the researchers injected the mice with the protein. Were their predictions confirmed? Explain.
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Does pleasure get old?
They say youth is wasted on the young, but when it comes to pleasure chemicals in our brains, the opposite may be true. A study released today shows that there is a drastic change in how our brains respond to pleasure and reward as we age.
Interviewee: Karen Berman, National Institute of Mental Health
Copyright © ScienCentral, Inc. Additional footage courtesy Brookhaven National Laboratory.
We’re all aware that people tend to change as they get older. Things that once brought us pleasure are not as appealing and we can develop new interests and passions. This video suggests that some of these changes may involve areas of the brain and the way they respond to natural neurotransmitters.
|
4. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Which one of the neurotransmitters described in the textbook is discussed in this video? What is the function of this neurotransmitter? |
|
5. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Based on brain images in the video and your understanding of the functions of each of the lobes of the cortex, which of the four lobes of the cortex is the one the researchers looked at when they scanned the “thinking part of the brain” as it “responded to anticipating and then winning money”? |
|
6. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d The researchers measured dopamine levels and activity in “reward centers” of the brain. Was there a positive or negative correlation between dopamine levels and activity in the pleasure centers for young participants? Was the correlation positive or negative for older participants? What did they originally expect for older participants? |
|
fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Hearing Motion
Imagine if words created a taste in your mouth, or music generated bursts of color. Some people have a rare condition called synesthesia, where their senses are somewhat crossed. Now scientists have found a new type of that condition: people who “hear” motion.
Interviewees: Melissa Saenz, Caltech; Johannes Pulst-Korenberg
Copyright © ScienCentral, Inc.
We usually assume that each of our senses leads to its own unique type of mental experience. The phenomenon of synesthesia is shaking up this idea.
|
7. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d It is fine to say you “hear motion,” but proving that this is not just some sort of hallucination is more difficult. Dr. Saenz devised an experiment to see if this motion/sound synesthesia could be scientifically validated. She recruited people with and without this type of synesthesia to be in her study. What was her control condition? Did the groups differ in their performance on this control task? |
|
8. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d For the other (treatment) condition, the two groups did a different task. What was this task, and which group did better? |
|
9. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d What would be the advantage of having synesthesia in this task? |
|
fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Overeaters’ Brains
It might seem odd to ask how it is we know we are hungry, but scientists have been trying to understand the internal body signals for hunger for a long time. This video reports about some promising research.
Interviewee: Gene-Jack Wang, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Copyright © ScienCentral, Inc.
|
10. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d These researchers are interested in the idea that signals from our body tell us we need food. What particular signal—from what part of the body—is the focus of this video? |
|
11. fiogf49gjkf0d The researchers wanted to do an experiment. First, they recruited overweight and lean people to be in the study. Each participant in the study was first in a weak body signal condition and then in a strong body signal condition. How did the researchers manipulate the body signals for hunger? |
|
12. fiogf49gjkf0d According to the video, which group—overweight or lean--responded more strongly to the weak body signal condition? And what was the response the researchers measured? |
|
13. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d Which group responded more actively to the strong body signal condition? |
|
14. fiogf49gjkf0d fiogf49gjkf0d The textbook discusses how the brain knows the body is hungry. From your reading of that section, is the focus of research shown in this video surprising or is it in line with the best-known explanations of hunger? |
|