Skip to Main Content | Colorblind Mode: On Off

Chapter 13: The Presidency
You Decide
Presidential Power and Iraq

This exercise relates to the Policy Debate in Chapter 13 dealing with Iraq and presidential power. The goal of this exercise is to give you a better understanding of recent Supreme Court rulings on the limits of presidential power during wartime and the importance of separation of powers and checks and balances. The Constitution (as interpreted by the Supreme Court) balances the need for security against the need for freedom and human rights. Read and discuss two articles from the Christian Science Monitor, which will give you a better understanding of the limits on presidential power and the importance of freedom.

Read this article www.csmonitor.com/2004/0629/p01s04-usju.html from the Christian Science Monitor.

1. What impact did the rulings have on the Bush administration’s antiterrorism tactics?
2. What does Justice O’Connor mean when she argues that a "state of war is not a blank check for the president when it comes to the rights of the nation's citizens"?
3. Read this Christian Science Monitor, article: www.csmonitor.com/2004/1221/p02s01-usju.html

Explain why Osama Bin Laden’s driver could not be tried as a terrorism suspect. What requirement would the Bush administration need to fulfill before it can try Hamdan as a terrorist?

4. Some Bush administration officials have argued that harsh interrogation tactics are needed and recent reports reveal that hundreds (if not thousands) of prisoners have been tortured in Guantanamo, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Read the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution (found in the appendix of your text.) Do you think the framers would have wanted the President to be able to indefinitely lock up prisoners without a hearing?

5. In 2006, Congress passed a law giving President Bush much of what he wanted, including a ban on court hearings on the legitimacy of the indefinite detention of noncitizens.

However, in June of 2008, the Supreme Court stated that foreign terrorism suspects have rights under the Constitution to challenge their detention in U.S. civilian courts.

Read this article: www.csmonitor.com/2006/1006/p01s03-uspo.html and watch the video located here. Do you think it’s constitutional to deny prisoners the right to appeal their indefinite detention?

6. Do you think a fair balance exists between human rights and executive powers in this issue?
7. Irrespective of the Constitution, do you think any president should have the powers that President Bush sought? Explain.

Submit to Gradebook:

First Name:
 
Last Name:
 
Your Email Address:
 
Your Professor's Email Address:
 
Section:

Print This Page

Everyday politicsblog.com is an exciting and unique online forum where students and instructors can see how key ideas and themes from Norton’s American government texts help to explain today’s headlines and political trends.

Norton Ebooks

The ebook version We the People, Seventh Edition, offers the full content of the print version at half the price.

Norton Ebooks

The Norton Gradebook

Instructors and students now have an easy way to track online quiz scores with the Norton Gradebook.

Norton Gradebook


Mobilize.org is an all-partisan network dedicated to educating, empowering, and energizing young people to increase civic engagement and political participation.