WebFacts 1
With the many changes in meaning the term "modulation" has undergone, it is a
word to consider carefully in your reading! This word (and its equivalent in Greek, Latin,
Italian, French, and German) has been used in reference to music since earliest times. In Greek
sources, it meant a change in the sizes and pattern of intervals, a change of mode type, a change
from one (Greek) mode to another, or a change of ethos (emotional content).
In writings by Boethius (c. 480-526)-the writer who provided a transition between the
early Greek theorists and those of the Middle Ages by translating Greek treatises into Latin-the
additional meaning of "measurement" (of intervals or time) was added to the term (in Latin,
modulatio). In the Middle Ages, some writers retained the older meanings, but for others
"modulation" referred to melody-especially its shape and motion as a melodic line moves from
one note to another.
The prominent Renaissance music theorist Gioseffo Zarlino used the term (in Italian,
modulatione) in several contexts: in the older sense of note-to-note motion through successive
intervals in a melody, and as motion from one harmonic interval to the next in counterpoint. For
Zarlino, modulation was a process that resulted in appropriate intervals and harmonies. By the
eighteenth century, "modulation" conveyed the meaning it does now, but it also retained the
older ideas of motion within a melody or harmonic progression, and a change of pattern or
intervals. In any case, modulation was considered a process, not an object or a location in the
music.
By the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, most of the older meanings had
fallen out of use-modulation (in the context of harmony) now meant the process of changing
from one key to another. Even so, the term continued to evolve: in the mid-twentieth century
with the advent of electronic music composition, modulation was used for one type of electronic
manipulation of timbre (as in "ring modulation," for example).
|
|