Populist Party Platform (1892)
The party platform summarizes the complaints and demands of many rural Americans.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
The People's party, more commonly known as the Populist party, was organized in St. Louis in 1892 to represent the common folk—especially farmers—against the entrenched interests of railroads, bankers, processers, corporations, and the politicians in league with such interests. At its first national convention in Omaha in July 1892, the party nominated James K. Weaver for president and ratified the so-called Omaha Platform, drafted by Ignatius Donnelly of Minnesota.
Assembled upon the 116th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the People's Party of America, in their first national convention, invoking upon their action the blessing of Almighty God, put forth in the name and on behalf of the people of this country, the following preamble and declaration of principles:
Preamble
The conditions which surround us best justify our cooperation; we meet in the midst of a nation brought to the verge of moral, political, and material ruin. Corruption dominates the ballot-box, the Legislatures, the Congress, and touches even the ermine of the bench.1
The people are demoralized; most of the States have been compelled to isolate the voters at the polling places to prevent universal intimidation and bribery. The newspapers are largely subsidized or muzzled, public opinion silenced, business prostrated, homes covered with mortgages, labor impoverished, and the land concentrating in the hands of capitalists. The urban workmen are denied the right to organize for self-protection, imported pauperized labor beats down their wages, a hireling standing army, unrecognized by our laws, is established to shoot them down, and they are rapidly degenerating into European conditions. The fruits of the toil of millions are badly stolen to build up colossal fortunes for a few, unprecedented in the history of mankind; and the possessors of these, in turn, despise the Republic and endanger liberty. From the same prolific womb of governmental injustice we breed the two great classes—tramps and millionaires. The national power to create money is appropriated to enrich bond-holders; a vast public debt payable in legal-tender currency has been funded into gold-bearing bonds, thereby adding millions to the burdens of the people.
Silver, which has been accepted as coin since the dawn of history, has been demonetized to add to the purchasing power of gold by decreasing the value of all forms of property as well as human labor, and the supply of currency is purposely abridged to fatten usurers, bankrupt enterprise, and enslave industry. A vast conspiracy against mankind has been organized on two continents, and it is rapidly taking possession of the world. If not met and overthrown at once it forebodes terrible social convulsions, the destruction of civilization, or the establishment of an absolute despotism.
We have witnessed for more than a quarter of a century the struggles of the two great political parties for power and plunder, while grievous wrongs have been inflicted upon the suffering people. We charge that the controlling influences dominating both these parties have permitted the existing dreadful conditions to develop without serious effort to prevent or restrain them. Neither do they now promise us any substantial reform. They have agreed together to ignore, in the coming campaign, ever issue but one. They propose to drown the outcries of a plundered people with the uproar of a sham battle over the tariff, so that capitalists, corporations, national banks, rings, trusts, watered stock, the demonetization of silver and the oppressions of the usurers may all be lost sight of. They propose to sacrifice our homes, lives, and children on the altar of mammon; to destroy the multitude in order to secure corruption funds from the millionaires.
Assembled on the anniversary of the birthday of the nation, and filled with the spirit of the grand general and chief who established our independence, we seek to restore the government of the Republic to the hands of the ''plain people,'' with which class it originated. We assert our purposes to be identical with the purposes of the National Constitution; to form a more perfect union and establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. . . .
Our country finds itself confronted by conditions for which there is not precedent in the history of the world; our annual agricultural productions amount to billions of dollars in value, which must, within a few weeks or months, be exchanged for billions of dollars' worth of commodities consumed in their production; the existing currency supply is wholly inadequate to make this exchange; the results are falling prices, the formation of combines and rings, the impoverishment of the producing class. We pledge ourselves that if given power we will labor to correct these evils by wise and reasonable legislation, in accordance with the terms of our platform. We believe that the power of government—in other words, of the people—should be expanded (as in the case of the postal service) as rapidly and as far as the good sense of an intelligent people and the teaching of experience shall justify, to the end that oppression, injustice, and poverty shall eventually cease in the land. . . .
Platform
We declare, therefore—
First.—That the union of the labor forces of the United States this day consummated shall be permanent and perpetual; may its spirit enter into all hearts for the salvation of the republic and the uplifting of mankind.
Second.—Wealth belongs to him who creates it, and every dollar taken from industry without an equivalent is robbery. ''If any will not work, neither shall he eat.'' The interests of rural and civil labor are the same; their enemies are identical.
Third.—We believe that the time has come when the railroad corporations will either own the people or the people must own the railroads; and should the government enter upon the work of owning and managing all railroads, we should favor an amendment to the constitution by which all persons engaged in the government service shall be placed under a civil-service regulation of the most rigid character, so as to prevent the increase of the power of the national administration by the use of such additional government employees.
FINANCE.—We demand a national currency, safe, sound, and flexible issued by the general government only, a full legal tender for all debts, public and private, and that without the use of banking corporations; a just, equitable, and efficient means of distribution direct to the people, at a tax not to exceed 2 per cent, per annum, to be provided as set forth in the sub-treasury plan of the Farmers' Alliance, or a better system; also by payments in discharge of its obligations for public improvements.
- We demand free and unlimited coinage of silver and gold at the present legal ratio of 16 to 1.
- We demand that the amount of circulating medium2 be speedily increased to not less than $50 per capita.
- We demand a graduated income tax.
- We believe that the money of the country should be kept as much as possible in the hands of the people, and hence we demand that all State and national revenues shall be limited to the necessary expenses of the government, economically and honestly administered. We demand that postal savings banks be established by the government for the safe deposit of the earnings of the people and to facilitate exchange.
TRANSPORTATION.—Transportation being a means of exchange and a public necessity, the government should own and operate the railroads in the interest of the people. The telegraph and telephone, like the post-office system, being a necessity for the transmission of news, should be owned and operated by the government in the interest of the people.
LAND.—The land, including all the natural sources of wealth, is the heritage of the people, and should not be monopolized for speculative purposes, and alien ownership of land should be prohibited. All land now held by railroads and other corporations in excess of their actual needs, and all lands now owned by aliens should be reclaimed by the government and held for actual settlers only.
Expressions of Sentiments
Your Committee on Platform and Resolutions beg leave unanimously to report the following: Whereas, Other questions have been presented for our consideration, we hereby submit the following, not as a part of the Platform of the People's Party, but as resolutions expressive of the sentiment of this Convention.
- RESOLVED, That we demand a free ballot and a fair count in all elections and pledge ourselves to secure it to every legal voter without Federal Intervention, through the adoption by the States of the unperverted Australian or secret ballot system.
- RESOLVED, That the revenue derived from a graduated income tax should be applied to the reduction of the burden of taxation now levied upon the domestic industries of this country.
- RESOLVED, That we pledge our support to fair and liberal pensions to ex-Union soldiers and sailors.
- RESOLVED, That we condemn the fallacy of protecting American labor under the present system, which opens our ports to the pauper and criminal classes of the world and crowds out our wage-earners; and we denounce the present ineffective laws against contract labor, and demand the further restriction of undesirable emigration.
- RESOLVED, That we cordially sympathize with the efforts of organized workingmen to shorten the hours of labor, and demand a rigid enforcement of the existing eight-hour law on Government work, and ask that a penalty clause be added to the said law.
- RESOLVED, That we regard the maintenance of a large standing army of mercenaries, known as the Pinkerton system, as a menace to our liberties, and we demand its abolition. . . .
- RESOLVED, That we commend to the favorable consideration of the people and the reform press the legislative system known as the initiative and referendum.
- RESOLVED, That we favor a constitutional provision limiting the office of President and Vice-President to one term, and providing for the election of Senators of the United States by a direct vote of the people.
- RESOLVED, That we oppose any subsidy or national aid to any private corporation for any purpose.
- RESOLVED, That this convention sympathizes with the Knights of Labor and their righteous contest with the tyrannical combine of clothing manufacturers of Rochester, and declare it to be a duty of all who hate tyranny and oppression to refuse to purchase the goods made by the said manufacturers, or to patronize any merchants who sell such goods.
1. A valuable white fur adorning the robes of some judges.
2. Currency and/or coin.
| Citation / Source : |
From ''People's Party Platform,'' Omaha Morning World-Herald , 5 July 1892 |
|
| Reference : |
America: A Narrative History, 6th Edition, Chapter 22; Inventing America, Chapter 19; Give Me Liberty, Chapter 17
|
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. What type of document is this? (Ex. Newspaper, telegram, map, letter, memorandum, congressional record) |
|
|
| 2. For what audience was the document written? |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What do you find interesting or important about this document? |
|
|
| 4. Is there a particular phrase or section that you find particularly meaningful or surprising? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this document tell you about life in this culture at the time it was written? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook:
The Farmer's Situation (1890s)
Author W.A. Peffer became the first Populist elected to serve in the United States Senate.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
Nothing has done more to injure the [Western] region than these freight rates. The railroads have retarded its growth as much as they first hastened it. The rates are often four times as large as Eastern rates. . . . The extortionate character of the freight rates has been recognized by all parties, and all have pledged themselves to lower them, but no state west of the Missouri has been able to do so.
In the early days, people were so anxious to secure railways that they would grant any sort of concession which the companies asked. There were counties in Iowa and other Western states struggling under heavy loads of bond-taxes, levied twenty-five years ago, to aid railways of which not one foot has been built. Perhaps a little grading would be done, and then the project would be abandoned, the bonds transferred, and the county called upon by the "innocent purchaser" to pay the debt incurred by blind credulity. I have known men to sacrifice fortunes, brains, and lives in fighting vainly this iniquitous bond-swindle.
Railways have often acquired mines and other properties by placing such high freight rates upon their products that the owner was compelled to sell at the railroad company's own terms. These freight rates have been especially burdensome to the farmers, who are far from their selling and buying markets, thus robbing them in both directions.
Another fact which has incited the farmer against corporations is the bold and unblushing participation of the railways in politics. At every political convention their emissaries are present with blandishments and passes and other practical arguments to secure the nomination of their friends. The sessions of these legislatures are disgusting scenes of bribery and debauchery. There is not an attorney of prominence in Western towns who does not carry a pass or has not had the opportunity to do so. The passes, of course, compass the end sought. By these means, the railroads have secured an iron grip upon legislatures and officers, while no redress has been given to the farmer.
The land question, also, is a source of righteous complaint. Much of the land of the West, instead of being held for actual settlers, has been bought up by speculators and Eastern syndicates in large tracts. They have done nothing to improve the land and have simply waited for the inevitable settler who bought cheaply a small "patch" and proceeded to cultivate it. When he had prospered so that he needed more land, he found that his own labor had increased tremendously the value of the adjacent land. . . .
Closely connected with the land abuse are the money grievances. As his pecuniary condition grew more serious, the farmer could not make payments on his land. Or he found that, with the ruling prices, he could not sell his produce at a profit. In either case he needed money, to make the payment or maintain himself until prices should rise. When he went to the moneylenders, these men, often dishonest usurers, told him that money was very scarce, that the rate of interest was rapidly rising, etc., so that in the end the farmer paid as much interest a month as the moneylender was paying a year for the same money. In this transaction, the farmer obtained his first glimpse of the idea of "the contraction of the currency at the hands of Eastern money sharks."
Disaster always follows the exaction of such exorbitant rates of interest, and want or eviction quickly came. Consequently, when demagogues went among the farmers to utter their calamitous cries, the scales seemed to drop from the farmer's eyes, and he saw gold bugs, Shylocks, conspiracies, and criminal legislation ad infinitum. Like a lightning flash, the idea of political action ran through the Alliances. A few farmers' victories in county campaigns the previous year became a promise of broader conquest, and with one bound the Farmers' Alliance went into politics all over the West.
[From F. B. Tracy, "Why the Farmers Revolted," Forum 16 (October 1893): 242–43.]
Farmers are passing through the "valley and shadow of death"; farming as a business is profitless; values of farm products have fallen 50 per cent since the great war, and farm values have depreciated 25 to 50 per cent during the last ten years; farmers are overwhelmed with debts secured by mortgages on their homes, unable in many instances to pay even the interest as it falls due, and unable to renew the loans because securities are weakening by reason of the general depression; many farmers are losing their homes under this dreadful blight, and the mortgage mill still grinds. We are in the hands of a merciless power; the people's homes are at stake. . . .
The American farmer of today is altogether a different sort of a man from his ancestor of fifty or a hundred years ago. . . . All over the West, . . . the farmer thrashes his wheat all at one time, he disposes of it all at one time, and in a great many instances the straw is wasted. He sells his hogs, and buys bacon and pork; he sells his cattle, and buys fresh beef and canned beef or corned beef, as the case may be; he sells his fruit, and buys it back in cans. . . . Not more than one farmer in fifty now keeps sheep at all; he relies upon the large sheep farmer for the wool, which is put into cloth or clothing ready for his use. Instead of having clothing made up on the farm in his own house or by a neighbor woman or country tailor a mile away, he either purchases his clothing ready made at the nearest town, or he buys the cloth and has a city tailor make it up for him. Instead of making implements which he uses about the farm—forks, rakes, etc., he goes to town to purchase even a handle for his axe or his mallet; . . . indeed, he buys nearly everything now that he produced at one time himself, and these things all cost money.
Besides all this, and what seems stranger than anything else, whereas in the earlier time the American home was a free home, unencumbered, . . . and whereas but a small amount of money was then needed for actual use in conducting the business of farming, there was always enough of it among the farmers to supply the demand, now, when at least ten times as much is needed, there is little or none to be obtained. . . .
The railroad builder, the banker, the money changer, and the manufacturer undermined the farmer. . . . The manufacturer came with his woolen mill, his carding mill, his broom factory, his rope factory, his wooden-ware factory, his cotton factory, his pork-packing establishment, his canning factory and fruit-preserving houses; the little shop on the farm has given place to the large shop in town; the wagon-maker's shop in the neighborhood has given way to the large establishment in the city where men by the thousand work and where a hundred or two hundred wagons are made in a week; the shoemaker's shop has given way to large establishments in the cities where most of the work is done by machines; the old smoke house has given way to the packing house, and the fruit cellars have been displaced by preserving factories. The farmer now is compelled to go to town for nearly everything that he wants. . . . And what is worse than all, if he needs a little more money than he has about him, he is compelled to go to town to borrow it. But he does not find the money there; in place of it he finds an agent who will "negotiate" a loan for him. The money is in the East . . . five thousand miles away. He pays the agent his commission, pays all the expenses of looking through the records and furnishing abstracts, pays for every postage stamp used in the transaction, and finally receives a draft for the amount of money required, minus these expenses. In this way the farmers of the country today are maintaining an army of middlemen, loan agents, bankers, and others, who are absolutely worthless for all good purposes in the community. . . .
These things, however, are on only the mechanical side of the farmer. His domain has been invaded by men of his own calling, who have taken up large tracts of land and farmed upon the plan of the manufacturers who employ a great many persons to perform the work under one management. This is "bonanza" farming. . . . The aim of some of the great "bonanza farms" of Dakota has been to apply machinery so effectually that the cultivation of one full section, or six hundred and forty acres, shall represent one year's work of only one man. This has not yet been reached, but so far as the production of the grain of wheat is concerned, one man's work will now give to each of one thousand persons enough for a barrel of flour a year, which is the average ration. . . .
The manufacture of oleomargarine came into active competition with farm butter. And about the same time a process was discovered by which a substitute for lard was produced—an article so very like the genuine lard taken from the fat of swine that the farmer himself was deceived by it. . . .
From this array of testimony the reader need have no difficulty in determining for himself "how we got here." The hand of the money changer is upon us. Money dictates our financial policy; money controls the business of the country; money is despoiling the people. . . . These men of Wall Street . . . hold the bonds of nearly every state, county, city and township in the Union; every railroad owes them more than it is worth. Corners in grain and other products of toil are the legitimate fruits of Wall Street methods. Every trust and combine made to rob the people had its origin in the example of Wall Street dealers. . . . This dangerous power which money gives is fast undermining the liberties of the people. It now has control of nearly half their homes, and is reaching out its clutching hands for the rest. This is the power we have to deal with.
| Citation / Source : |
From W. A. Peffer, The Farmer's Side (New York, 1891), pp. 42, 56, 5863, 12123 |
|
| Reference : |
America: A Narrative History, 6th Edition, Chapter 22; Inventing America, Chapter 19; Give Me Liberty, Chapter 17
|
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. What type of document is this? (Ex. Newspaper, telegram, map, letter, memorandum, congressional record) |
|
|
| 2. For what audience was the document written? |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What do you find interesting or important about this document? |
|
|
| 4. Is there a particular phrase or section that you find particularly meaningful or surprising? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this document tell you about life in this culture at the time it was written? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook:
Response to the Farmer's Protests (1896)
Newspaper editor William Allen White, a staunch Republican, was critical of the Populist movement.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
Today the Kansas Department of Agriculture sent out a statement which indicates that Kansas has gained less than two thousand people in the past year. There are about two hundred and twenty-five thousand families in this state, and there were ten thousand babies born in Kansas, and yet so many people have left the state that the natural increase is cut down to less than two thousand net.
This has been going on for eight years.
If there had been a high brick wall around the state eight years ago, and not a soul had been admitted or permitted to leave, Kansas would be a half million souls better off than she is today. And yet the nation has increased in population. In five years ten million people have been added to the national population, yet instead of gaining a share of this—say, half a million—Kansas has apparently been a plague spot and, in the very garden of the world, has lost population by ten thousands every year.
Not only has she lost population, but she has lost money. Every moneyed man in the state who could get out without loss has gone. Every month in every community sees someone who has a little money pack up and leave the state. This has been going on for eight years. Money has been drained out all the time. In towns where ten years ago there were three or four or half a dozen money-lending concerns, stimulating industry by furnishing capital, there is now none, or one or two that are looking after the interests and principal already outstanding.
No one brings any money into Kansas any more. What community knows over one or two men who have moved in with more than $5,000 in the past three years? And what community cannot count half a score of men in that time who have left, taking all the money they could scrape together?
Yet the nation has grown rich; other states have increased in population and wealth—other neighboring states. Missouri has gained over two million, while Kansas has been losing half a million. Nebraska has gained in wealth and population while Kansas has gone downhill. Colorado has gained every way, while Kansas has lost every way since 1888.
What's the matter with Kansas?
There is no substantial city in the state. Every big town save one has lost in population. Yet Kansas City, Omaha, Lincoln, St. Louis, Denver, Colorado Springs, Sedalia, the cities of the Dakotas, St. Paul and Minneapolis and Des Moines—all cities and towns in the West—have steadily grown.
Take up the government blue book and you will see that Kansas is virtually off the map. Two or three little scrubby consular places in yellow-fever-stricken communities that do not aggregate ten thousand dollars a year is all the recognition that Kansas has. Nebraska draws about one hundred thousand dollars; little old North Dakota draws about fifty thousand dollars; Oklahoma doubles Kansas; Missouri leaves her a thousand miles behind; Colorado is almost seven times greater than Kansas—the whole west is ahead of Kansas.
Take it by any standard you please, Kansas is not in it.
Go east and you hear them laugh at Kansas; go west and they sneer at her; go south and they "cuss" her; go north and they have forgotten her. Go into any crowd of intelligent people gathered anywhere on the globe, and you will find the Kansas man on the defensive. The newspaper columns and magazines once devoted to praise of her, to boastful facts and startling figures concerning her resources, are now filled with cartoons, jibes and Pefferian speeches. Kansas just naturally isn't in it. She has traded places with Arkansas and Timbuctoo.
What's the matter with Kansas?
We all know; yet here we are at it again. We have an old mossback Jacksonian who snorts and howls because there is a bathtub in the State House; we are running that old jay for Governor. We have another shabby, wild-eyed, rattlebrained fanatic who has said openly in a dozen speeches that "the rights of the user are paramount to the rights of the owner": we are running him for Chief Justice, so that capital will come tumbling over itself to get into the state. We have raked the old ash heap of failure in the state and found an old human hoop skirt who has failed as a businessman, who has failed as an editor, who has failed as a preacher, and we are going to run him for Congressman-at-Large. He will help the looks of the Kansas delegation at Washington. Then we have discovered a kid without a law practice and have decided to run him for Attorney General. Then, for fear some hint that the state had become respectable might percolate through the civilized portions of the nation, we have decided to send three or four harpies out lecturing, telling the people that Kansas is raising hell and letting the corn go to weed.
Oh, this is a state to be proud of! We are a people who can hold up our heads! What we need is not more money, but less capital, fewer white shirts and brains, fewer men with business judgment, and more of those fellows who boast that they are "just ordinary clodhoppers, but they know more in a minute about finance than John Sherman"; we need more men who are "posted," who can bellow about the crime of '73, who hate prosperity, and who think, because a man believes in national honor, he is a tool of Wall Street. We have had a few of them—some hundred fifty thousand—but we need more.
We need several thousand gibbering idiots to scream about the "Great Red Dragon" of Lombard Street. We don't need population, we don't need wealth, we don't need well-dressed men on the streets, we don't need cities on the fertile prairies; you bet we don't! What we are after is the money power. Because we have become poorer and ornerier and meaner than a spavined, distempered mule, we, the people of Kansas, propose to kick; we don't care to build up, we wish to tear down.
"There are two ideas of government," said our noble Bryan at Chicago. "There are those who believe that if you legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous, this prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea has been that if you legislate to make the masses prosperous their prosperity will find its way up and through every class and rest upon them."
That's the stuff! Give the prosperous man the dickens! Legislate the thriftless man into ease, whack the stuffing out of the creditors and tell the debtors who borrowed the money five years ago when money "per capita" was greater than it is now, that the contraction of currency gives him a right to repudiate.
Whoop it up for the ragged trousers; put the lazy, greasy fizzle, who can't pay his debts, on the altar, and bow down and worship him. Let the state ideal be high. What we need is not the respect of our fellow men, but the chance to get something for nothing.
Oh, yes, Kansas is a great state. Here are people fleeing from it by the score every day, capital going out of the state by the hundreds of dollars; and every industry but farming paralyzed, and that crippled, because its products have to go across the ocean before they can find a laboring man at work who can afford to buy them. Let's don't stop this year. Let's drive all the decent, self-respecting men out of the state. Let's keep the old clodhoppers who know it all. Let's encourage the man who is "posted." He can talk, and what we need is not mill hands to eat our meat, nor factory hands to eat our wheat, nor cities to oppress the farmer by consuming his butter and eggs and chickens and produce. What Kansas needs is men who can talk, who have large leisure to argue the currency question while their wives wait at home for the nickel's worth of bluing.
What's the matter with Kansas?:
Nothing under the shining sun. She is losing her wealth, population and standing. She has got her statesmen, and the money power is afraid of her. Kansas is all right. She has started in to raise hell, as Mrs. Lease advised, and she seems to have an overproduction. But that doesn't matter. Kansas never did believe in diversified crops. Kansas is all right. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Kansas. "Every prospect pleases and only man is vile."
| Author : |
William Allen White |
|
| Citation / Source : |
From William Allen White, The Autobiography of William Allen White (New York: Macmillan Co., 1946), pp. 28083 |
|
| Reference : |
America: A Narrative History, 6th Edition, Chapter 22; Inventing America, Chapter 19; Give Me Liberty, Chapter 17
|
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. What type of document is this? (Ex. Newspaper, telegram, map, letter, memorandum, congressional record) |
|
|
| 2. For what audience was the document written? |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What do you find interesting or important about this document? |
|
|
| 4. Is there a particular phrase or section that you find particularly meaningful or surprising? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this document tell you about life in this culture at the time it was written? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook:
The Strength and Weakness of the People's Movement (1892), Eva McDonald-Valesh
This insightful article identifies a crucial weakness in the Populist strategy.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
The emergence of the People's party generated great interest within social and politcal reform circles across the country. The following article in the Boston-based Arena magazine focused on the need for the agrarian-based organization to make common cause with the urban working class. Its insights and warnings proved to be quite astute.
The rapid growth and popularity of the political movement known as the People's Party invest it with an importance that leads the general public to scan it closely for those indices which mark all truly great industrial movements. If it has not certain characteristics, it may excite those momentary outbursts of discontent emanating from a single class, only to die of inanition or be buried under a storm of well-directed ridicule.
A political movement, to be an instrument of real industrial progress, ought to be general enough in its scope to embrace all classes of workers whose conditions are affected by the same general causes. Today there is the agricultural population, on one hand, producing more than enough to feed the world; on the other, the city workmen; producing, in their many occupations, more than enough to clothe and supply all other civilized needs of the race. The two classes are quite distinct, so far as environment is concerned; yet consuming each other's products and supplying both necessities and luxuries to all other classes, there is between them a bond of common interest, stronger than either realizes.
Both classes, while conceding the immeasurable superiority of their present condition over that of their ancestors of any time, still feel that many differences are yet to be adjusted before industry attains the dignity warranted by the achievements and progress of the nineteenth century. Each division of the industrial body has various grades of expressed discontent with the present and hope for the future. . . .
The two great bodies of organized discontent1 are working independently and by different methods on the same problem—the distribution of wealth. In the past, having observed so little their relations to each other, or the local conditions seeming to form a barrier between them, they now appear to have but faint sympathy or community of interest.
It is of vast significance that the two organizations have the same reason for existing, and are trying to solve the same problem. Some combination of circumstances must soon reveal its community of purpose, and from that moment the workers of the farm and the factory will be bound by that strongest of ties, self-interest. The industrial world is becoming convinced that the People's Party will be this agent.
The recent conference at St. Louis showed that a surprisingly large number of reform elements already agree on the general principles, leaving details to the future. . . . Still, to those familiar with industrial organization in cities, this conference revealed that the mass of city workers was unrepresented. Did this silence mean antagonism, even indifference, it might prove fatal to the success of the new movement. For if the People's Party, in its ultimate development, only represents a class, no matter how large that class, its work must necessarily partake of a sectional character, and from a lack of breadth and depth, fail to accomplish those great reforms which mark epochs of civilization. . . .
A promising field of work open to view, although it still needs cultivation. Workingmen understand the value of the right of suffrage and its importance in securing industrial reform. They cannot fail to be keenly dissatisfied with the prospect held out by existing parties.2 The agricultural classes equally need just the elements that the cities could contribute. Each organization would be the gainer from close contact and interchange of views with the other.
There is still an element wanting to insure harmonious action. It is a peculiarity of the People's movement that it has not yet produced a leader. It has teachers—earnest, thoughtful, and progressive. It has statesmen of good parts. But a leader, in the true sense, is yet wanting. . . . A true leader can unite them in so irresistible a force that by a peaceful revolution of ballots, great abuses will be swept away and replaced by more equitable conditions inuring to the benefit of all society.
Nor should such a coalition of the forces of farm and factory be feared by the most conservative. The world will advance, in spite of the remonstrances from those who are perfectly satisfied with the existing order. Reforms, working in peaceful and legitimate channels, are a sure guarantee against the violence which, in preceding eras, has so often accompanied popular movements.
1. Farmers and laborers.
2. I. e., national political parties.
| Author : |
Eva McDonald-Valesh |
|
| Citation / Source : |
From Eva McDonald-Valesh, ''The Strength and Weakness of the People's Movement,'' Arena 5 (May 1892):726-31 |
|
| Reference : |
 America: A Narrative History, 6th Edition, Chapter 22; Inventing America, Chapter 19; Give Me Liberty, Chapter 17
|
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. What type of document is this? (Ex. Newspaper, telegram, map, letter, memorandum, congressional record) |
|
|
| 2. For what audience was the document written? |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What do you find interesting or important about this document? |
|
|
| 4. Is there a particular phrase or section that you find particularly meaningful or surprising? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this document tell you about life in this culture at the time it was written? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook:
Image: Members of the Texas Alliance
This image of members of the Texas Alliance, a precursor of the People's Party, reveals the hardscrabble nature of rural life.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
This image of members of the Texas Alliance, a precursor of the People's Party, reveals the hardscrabble nature of rural life.
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. Which individual items within the picture are drawn to your attention? |
|
|
| 2. List the characters, objects, and / or action in the photograph. |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What is your overall impression of this photograph? |
|
|
| 4. What is this photograph attempting to convey to the viewer? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this photograph tell you about this period in America History? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook:
William Jennings Bryan
Bryan received the presidential nomination from both the Democratic and Populist parties in 1896.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
Bryan received the presidential nomination from both the Democratic and Populist parties in 1896.
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. Which individual items within the picture are drawn to your attention? |
|
|
| 2. List the characters, objects, and / or action in the photograph. |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What is your overall impression of this photograph? |
|
|
| 4. What is this photograph attempting to convey to the viewer? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this photograph tell you about this period in America History? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook:
William Jennings Bryan: Cross of Gold Speech (July 1896)
One of the most famous orations in American history, William Jennings Bryan's Cross of Gold speech identifies issues popular with farmers.
Topic: Agrarian Discontent
Please study this document and answer the following questions.
William Jennings Bryan's "Cross of Gold"
Speech
July 9, 1896, at the Democratic National Convention,
Chicago
Mr. Chairman and Gentlemen of the Convention: I would be
presumptuous, indeed, to present myself against the distinguished gentlemen to
whom you have listened if this were a mere measuring of abilities; but this is
not a contest between persons. The humblest citizen in all the land, when clad
in the armor of a righteous cause, is stronger than all the hosts of error. I
come to speak to you in defense of a cause as holy as the cause of liberty--the
cause of humanity.
Never before in the history of this country has there been
witnessed such a contest as that through which we have just passed. Never before
in the history of American politics has a great issue been fought out as this
issue has been, by the voters of a great party. ....
With a zeal approaching the zeal which inspired the
crusaders who followed Peter the hermit, our silver Democrats went forth from
victory unto victory until they are now assembled, not to discuss, not to
debate, but to enter up the judgment already rendered by the plain people of
this country. In this contest brother has been arrayed against brother, father
against son. the warmest ties of love, acquaintance and association have been
disregarded; old leaders have been cast aside when they have refused to give
expression to the sentiments of those whom they would lead, and new leaders have
sprung up to give direction to the cause of truth. Thus has the contest been
waged, and we have assembled here under as binding and solemn instructions as
were ever imposed upon representatives of the people. ....
The gentleman who preceded me (ex-Governor Russell) spoke of
the State of Massachusetts; let me assure him that not one present in all this
convention entertains the least hostility to the people of the State of
Massachusetts, but we stand here representing people who are the equals, before
the law, of the greatest citizens in the State of Massachusetts. When you
[turning to the gold delegates] come before us and tell us that we are about to
disturb your business interests, we reply that you have disturbed our business
interests by your course.
We say to you that you have made the definition of a
business man too limited in its application. The man who is employed for wages
is as much a business man as his employer; the attorney in a country town is as
much a business man as the corporation counsel in a great metropolis; the
merchant at the cross-roads store is as much a business man as the merchant of
New York; the farmer who goes forth in the morning and toils all day--who begins
in the spring and toils all summer--and who by the application of brain and
muscle to the natural resources of the country creates wealth, is as much a
business man as the man who goes upon the board of trade and bets upon the price
of grain; the miners who go down a thousand feet into the earth, or climb two
thousand feet upon the cliffs, and bring forth from their hiding places the
precious metals to be poured into the channels of trade are as much business men
as the few financial magnates who, in a back room, corner the money of the
world. We come to speak for this broader class of business men.
Ah, my friends, we say not one word against those who live
upon the Atlantic coast, but the hardy pioneers who have braved all the dangers
of the wilderness, who have made the desert to blossom as the rose--the pioneers
away out there [pointing to the West], who rear their children near to Nature's
heart, where they can mingle their voices with the voices of the birds--out
there where they have erected schoolhouses for the education of their young,
churches where they praise their Creator, and cemeteries where rest the ashes of
their dead--these people, we say, are as deserving of the consideration of our
party as any people in this country. It is for these that we speak. We do not
come as aggressors. Our war is not a war of conquest; we are fighting in the
defense of our homes, our families, and posterity. We have petitioned, and our
petitions have been scorned; we have entreated, and our entreaties have been
disregarded; we have begged, and they have mocked when our calamity came. We beg
no longer; we entreat no more; we petition no more. We defy them.
The gentleman from Wisconsin [Senator Vilas] has said that
he fears a Robespierre. My friends, in this land of the free you need not fear
that a tyrant will spring up from among the people. What we need is an Andrew
Jackson to stand, as Jackson stood, against the encroachments of organized
wealth.
They tell us that this platform was made to catch votes. We
reply to them that changing conditions make new issues; that the principles upon
which Democracy rests are as everlasting as the hills, but that they must be
applied to new conditions as they arise. Conditions have arisen, and we are here
to meet those conditions. They tell us that the income tax ought not to be
brought in here; that it is a new idea. They criticize us for our criticism of
the Supreme Court of the United States. My friends, we have not criticized; we
have simply called attention to what you already know. If you want criticisms,
read the dissenting opinions of the court. There you will find criticisms. They
say that we passed an unconstitutional law; we deny it. The income tax law was
not unconstitutional when it was passed; it was not unconstitutional when it
went before the Supreme Court for the first time; it did not become
unconstitutional until one of the judges changed his mind, and we cannot be
expected to know when a judge will change his mind. The income tax is just. It
simply intends to put the burdens of government justly upon the backs of the
people. I am in favor of an income tax. When I find a man who is not willing to
bear his share of the burdens of the government which protects him, I find a man
who is unworthy to enjoy the blessings of a government like ours.
They say that we are opposing national bank currency; it is
true. If you will read what Thomas Benton said, you will find he said that, in
searching history, he could find but one parallel to Andrew Jackson; that was
Cicero, who destroyed the conspiracy of Cataline and saved Rome. Benton said
that Cicero only did for Rome what Jackson did for us when he destroyed the bank
conspiracy and saved America. We say in our platform that we believe that the
right to coin and issue money is a function of government. We believe it. We
believe that it is a part of sovereignty, and can no more with safety be
delegated to private individuals than we could afford to delegate to private
individuals the power to make penal statutes or levy taxes. Mr. Jefferson, who
was once regarded as good Democratic authority, seems to have differed in
opinion from the gentleman who has addressed us on the part of the minority.
Those who are opposed to this proposition tell us that the issue of paper money
is a function of the bank, and that the Government ought to go out of the
banking business. I stand with Jefferson rather than with them, and tell them,
as he did, that the issue of money is a function of government, and that the
banks ought to go out of the governing business.
They complain about the plank which declares against life
tenure in office. They have tried to strain it to mean that which it does not
mean. What we oppose by that plank is the life tenure which is being built up in
Washington, and which excludes from participation in official benefits the
humbler members of society.
Let me call your attention to two or three important things.
The gentleman from New York says that he will propose an amendment to the
platform providing that the proposed change in our monetary system shall not
affect contracts already made. Let me remind you that there is no intention of
affecting those contracts which according to present laws are made payable in
gold; but if he means to say that we cannot change our monetary system without
protecting those who have loaned money before the change was made, I desire to
ask him where, in law or in morals, he can find justification for not protecting
the debtors when the act of 1873 was passed, if he now insists that we must
protect the creditors.
He says he will also propose an amendment which will provide
for the suspension of free coinage if we fail to maintain the parity within a
year. We reply that when we advocate a policy which we believe will be
successful, we are not compelled to raise a doubt as to our own sincerity by
suggesting what we shall do if we fail. I ask him, if he would apply his logic
to us, why he does not apply it to himself. He says he wants this country to try
to secure an international agreement. Why does he not tell us what he is going
to do if he fails to secure an international agreement? There is more reason for
him to do that than there is for us to provide against the failure to maintain
the parity. Our opponents have tried for twenty years to secure an international
agreement, and those are waiting for it most patiently who do not want it at
all.
And now, my friends, let me come to the paramount issue. If
they ask us why it is that we say more on the money question than we say upon
the tariff question, I reply that, if protection has slain its thousands, the
gold standard has slain its tens of thousands. If they ask us why we do not
embody in our platform all the things that we believe in, we reply that when we
have restored the money of the Constitution all other necessary reforms will be
possible; but that until this is done there is no other reform that can be
accomplished.
Why is it that within three months such a change has come
over the country? Three months ago, when it was confidently asserted that those
who believe in the gold standard would frame our platform and nominate our
candidates, even the advocates of the gold standard did not think that we could
elect a president. And they had good reason for their doubt, because there is
scarcely a State here today asking for the gold standard which is not in the
absolute control of the Republican party. But note the change. Mr. McKinley was
nominated at St. Louis upon a platform which declared for the maintenance of the
gold standard until it can be changed into bimetallism by international
agreement. Mr. McKinley was the most popular man among the Republicans, and
three months ago everybody in the Republican party prophesied his election. How
is it today? Why, the man who was once pleased to think that he looked like
Napoleon--that man shudders today when he remembers that he was nominated on the
anniversary of the battle of Waterloo. Not only that, but as he listens he can
hear with ever-increasing distinctness the sound of the waves as they beat upon
the lonely shores of St. Helena.
Why this change? Ah, my friends, is not the reason for the
change evident to any one who will look at the matter? No private character,
however pure, no personal popularity, however great, can protect from the
avenging wrath of an indignant people a man who will declare that he is in favor
of fastening the gold standard upon this country, or who is willing to surrender
the right of self-government and place the legislative control of our affairs in
the hands of foreign potentates and powers.
We go forth confident that we shall win. Why? Because upon
the paramount issue of this campaign there is not a spot of ground upon which
the enemy will dare to challenge battle. If they tell us that the gold standard
is a good thing, we shall point to their platform and tell them that their
platform pledges the party to get rid of the gold standard and substitute
bimetallism. If the gold standard is a good thing, why try to get rid of it? I
call your attention to the fact that some of the very people who are in this
convention today and who tell us that we ought to declare in favor of
international bimetallism--thereby declaring that the gold standard is wrong and
that the principle of bimetallism is better--these very people four months ago
were open and avowed advocates of the gold standard, and were then telling us
that we could not legislate two metals together, even with the aid of all the
world. If the gold standard is a good thing, we ought to declare in favor of its
retention and not in favor of abandoning it; and if the gold standard is a bad
thing why should we wait until other nations are willing to help us to let go?
Here is the line of battle, and we care not upon which issue they force the
fight; we are prepared to meet them on either issue or on both. If they tell us
that the gold standard is the standard of civilization, we reply to them that
this, the most enlightened of all the nations of the earth, has never declared
for a gold standard and that both the great parties this year are declaring
against it. If the gold standard is the standard of civilization, why, my
friends, should we not have it? If they come to meet us on that issue we can
present the history of our nation. More than that; we can tell them that they
will search the pages of history in vain to find a single instance where the
common people of any land have ever declared themselves in favor of the gold
standard. They can find where the holders of the fixed investments have declared
for a gold standard, but not where the masses have.
Mr. Carlisle said in 1878 that this was a struggle between
"the idle holders of idle capital" and "the struggling masses, who produce the
wealth and pay the taxes of the country;" and, my friends, the question we are
to decide is: Upon which side will the Democratic party fight; upon the side of
"the idle holders of idle capital" or upon the side of "the struggling masses?"
That is the question which the party must answer first, and then it must be
answered by each individual hereafter. The sympathies of the Democratic party,
as shown by the platform, are on the side of the struggling masses who have ever
been the foundation of the Democratic party. There are two ideas of government.
There are those who believe that, if you will only legislate to make the
well-to-do prosperous, their prosperity will leak through on those below. The
Democratic idea, however, has been that if you legislate to make the masses
prosperous, their prosperity will find its way up through every class which
rests upon them.
You come to us and tell us that the great cities are in
favor of the gold standard; we reply that the great cities rest upon our broad
and fertile prairies. Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities
will spring up again as if by magic; but destroy our farms and the grass will
grow in the streets of every city in the country.
My friends, we declare that this nation is able to legislate
for its own people on every question, without waiting for the aid or consent of
any other nation on earth; and upon that issue we expect to carry every State in
the Union. I shall not slander the inhabitants of the fair State of
Massachusetts nor the inhabitants of the State of New York by saying that, when
they are confronted with the proposition, they will declare that this nation is
not able to attend to its own business. It is the issue of 1776 over again. Our
ancestors, when but three millions in number, had the courage to declare their
political independence of every other nation; shall we, their descendants, when
we have grown to seventy millions, declare that we are less independent than our
forefathers? No, my friends, that will never be the verdict of our people.
Therefore, we care not upon what lines the battle is fought. If they say
bimetallism is good, but that we cannot have it until other nations help us, we
reply that, instead of having a gold standard because England has, we will
restore bimetallism, and then let England have bimetallism because the United
States has it. If they dare to come out in the open field and defend the gold
standard as a good thing, we will fight them to the uttermost.
Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the
world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests, and the
toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to
them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you
shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.
| Author : |
William Jennings Bryan |
|
| Reference : |
America: A Narrative History, 6th Edition, Chapter 23; Inventing America, Chapter 21; Give Me Liberty, Chapter 17
|
Click here for sample answers | Read the document again
|
Observation |
| 1. What type of document is this? (Ex. Newspaper, telegram, map, letter, memorandum, congressional record) |
|
|
| 2. For what audience was the document written? |
|
|
Expression |
| 3. What do you find interesting or important about this document? |
|
|
| 4. Is there a particular phrase or section that you find particularly meaningful or surprising? |
|
|
Connection |
| 5. What does this document tell you about life in this culture at the time it was written? |
|
|
Submit to Gradebook: