 |
English
men and women of the sixteenth century experienced
an unprecedented increase in knowledge of the
world beyond their island. Religious persecution
at home compelled a substantial number of both
Catholics and Protestants to live abroad; wealthy
gentlemen (and, in at least a few cases, ladies)
traveled in France and Italy to view the famous
cultural monuments; merchants published accounts
of distant lands like Turkey, Morocco, Egypt,
and Russia; and military and trading ventures
took English ships to still more distant shores.
In
1496, a Venetian tradesman living in Bristol,
John Cabot, was granted a license by Henry
VII to sail on a voyage of exploration, and
with his son Sebastian discovered Newfoundland
and Nova Scotia; in 1583, Sir Humphrey Gilbert
returned to Newfoundland to try to establish
a colony there. The Elizabethan age saw remarkable
feats of seamanship and reconnaissance. On
his ship the Golden Hinde, Sir Francis
Drake circumnavigated the globe in 1579 and
laid claim to California on behalf of the queen;
a few years later a ship commanded by Thomas
Cavendish also accomplished a circumnavigation.
Sir Martin Frobisher explored bleak Baffin
Island in search of a Northwest Passage to
the Orient; Sir John Davis explored the west
coast of Greenland and discovered the Falkland
Islands off the coast of Argentina; Sir John
Hawkins turned handsome profits for himself
and his investors (including the queen) in
the vicious business of privateering and slave
trading; Philip Amadas and Arthur Barlowe led
an expedition, financed by Sir Walter Ralegh,
to Virginia; Ralegh himself ventured up the
Orinoco Delta, in what is now Venezuela, in
search of the mythical land of El Dorado. Accounts
of these and other exploits were collected
by a clergyman and promoter of empire, Richard
Hakluyt, and published as The Principal
Navigations (1589; expanded edition 1599).
"To
seek new worlds for gold, for praise, for glory," as
Ralegh characterized such enterprises, was
not for the faint of heart: Gilbert, Drake,
Cavendish, Frobisher, and Hawkins all died
at sea, as did large numbers of those who sailed
under their command. Elizabethans who were
sensible enough to stay at home could do more
than read written accounts of their fellow
countrymen's far-reaching voyages. From
India and the Far East, merchants returned
with coveted spices and fabrics; from Egypt,
they imported ancient mummies, thought to have
medicinal value; from the New World, explorers
brought back native plants (including, most
famously, tobacco), animals, cultural artifacts,
and, on occasion, samples of the native peoples
themselves, most often seized against their
will. There were exhibitions in London of a
kidnapped Eskimo with his kayak and of Algonkians
from Virginia with their canoes. Most of these
miserable captives, violently uprooted and
vulnerable to European diseases, quickly perished,
but even in death they were evidently valuable
property: when the English will not give one
small coin "to relieve a lame beggar," one
of the characters in Shakespeare's Tempest wryly
remarks, "they will lay out ten to see
a dead Indian" (2.2.32–33).
Perhaps
most nations define what they are by defining
what they are not. This negative self-definition
is, in any case, what Elizabethans seem constantly
to be doing, in travel books, sermons, political
speeches, civic pageants, public exhibitions,
and theatrical spectacles of otherness. The
extraordinary variety of these exercises (which
include public executions and urban riots,
as well as more benign activities) suggests
that the boundaries of national identity were
by no means clear and unequivocal. Inspired
by Amerigo Vespucci's accounts of the New
World discoveries, Thomas More fashioned in Utopia (NAEL
8, 1.521) a searching critique of English society.
Descriptions of the lands and peoples of America
often invoke Ovid's vision of the Golden
Age, invariably with an implied contrast to
the state of affairs at home. Even peoples
whom English writers routinely, viciously stigmatised
as irreducibly alien — Italians, Indians,
Turks, and Jews — have a surprising instability
in the Elizabethan imagination and may appear
for brief, intense moments as powerful models
to be admired and emulated before they resume
their place as emblems of despised otherness.
In the course of urging his countrymen to seize
the land, rob the graves, and take the treasures
of Guiana, Sir Walter Ralegh finds much to
praise in the customs of the native peoples
(NAEL 8, 1.923-26); Thomas Hariot thinks
that the inhabitants of Virginia, though poor
in comparison with the English, are "ingenious" and
show much "excellency of wit" (NAEL
8, 1.939); "Let the cannons roar," writes
Michael Drayton in his Ode. To the
Virginia Voyage, even as he praises Virginia
as "Earth's only paradise" (NAEL
8, 1.1000). Perhaps the most profound exploration
of this instability was written not by an Englishman
but by the French nobleman Montaigne, whose
brilliant essay Of Cannibals, translated
by the gifted Elizabethan John Florio, directly
influenced Shakespeare's Tempest and
no doubt worked its subversive magic on many
other readers as well.
|
 |