Reduce Text Size Increase Text Size Print Page

Literature Online

American PassagesVisit our companion site,
American Passages. Produced in conjunction with Oregon Public Broadcasting, this rich site includes an archive featuring over 3,000 images, audio clips, presentation software, and more.

Norton Gradebook

Instructors now have an easy way to collect students’ online quizzes with the Norton Gradebook without flooding their inboxes with e-mails.

Students can track their online quiz scores by setting up their own Student Gradebook.

Authors

Jack London (1876-1916)

« back to list of Authors

Bibliography
Biography
Search the archive for images
Questions for Discussion and Writing

To Build a Fire (1908 version) is one of the best-known and most graphic works of American literary naturalism. But literary naturalism has an odd commerce with social history and fact. Sometimes we read these works as faithful to actual events and to human nature and prospects; sometimes these works are read as fables, as narratives with (at best) oblique connections to "life" or "truth," more suggestive of romanticism than of realism or reportage. The historical setting is accurate enough: the Yukon Gold Rush at the end of the nineteenth century and the hard, cold trail to the Chilcoot Pass. But beyond that, we have to ask ourselves what we are reading.

1. Who narrates To Build a Fire? The nameless protagonist, "the man," is by himself in the middle of a frozen wilderness, accompanied only by his dog. Describe the narrative strategy and viewpoints, and comment on the overall effectiveness of this strategy. Consider especially the passages which tell the tale from the point of view of the dog--including the thoughts of the animal.

2. Why do the man and the dog have no names? Are there perhaps several reasons for this reticence in the tale?

3. Does the story induce us to see this journey in the Yukon as a representation or allegory of life elsewhere, or even everywhere? Or are we led by the story to see its action as representing life at one particular extreme or edge, where the usual rules and protections have no bearing? Are we supposed to learn something from "the man's" mistake and from his death? If so, what is it? And how true do you think it is?