Mary Rowlandson
c. 1636 - 1711

Biography

Mary Rowlandson was probably born in England and brought to Lancaster, part of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, as a child. There she married Joseph Rowlandson, a minister, and for twenty years they raised their children and went about their duties in the colony. On February 20, 1676, Lancaster was attacked by Wampanoag Indians, led by Metacomet, or Philip, as he was known. This attack, one of many against settlements, was precipitated by the execution of three of Philip's men and, more generally, by the Indians' desire to reclaim their land from the colonists. Rowlandson was kidnapped and held captive for eleven weeks before being released for twenty pounds ransom. She wrote A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson (1682) soon after she returned to Lancaster, and, with its attention to adventure, heroism, piety, and character development, the book became one of the most popular works of the seventeenth century in England and America.

Explorations

Rowlandson's Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson (1682) is the most detailed eyewitness account of "King Philip's War," the uprising by Metacomet which killed six hundred colonists and about three thousand American Indians. The war traumatized the settlements, which were already badly shaken by doubts about New England as a "city upon a hill." A Narrative can be an intense reading experience if we are sensitive to the deep turmoil within Rowlandson's consciousness. She has suffered terribly at the hands of the Wampanoags, and she has been raised to think of them as demons, Philistines, agents of the Devil -- but because Puritanism has also taught her to observe her surroundings closely, she is capable of seeing them as human beings as well.

1. Compare the opening paragraph of "The First Remove" to the opening two paragraphs of "The Nineteenth Remove." The entire narrative was written in retrospect, not as a journal. Therefore the rhetorical change (from "barbarous creatures" and "merciless enemies" to the milder language of the later passage) cannot be attributed to a change in the circumstances of Rowlandson as a writer. How might we account for it? Does Rowlandson achieve some final view of her captors?

2. Rowlandson is ultimately ransomed and allowed to return to her home. She describes this return in a long paragraph beginning with "But to return again to my going home, where we may see a remarkable change of providence." After all of her suffering and losses, what moral and spiritual crisis does she experience when she is finally saved? How does she explain her good fortune to her readers, and to herself?

Other sites to consult: