W. W. Norton Home  |   Help  |   Contact Us  |  Site map  |  Site Credits Colorblind Mode: On Off

The Harlem Renaissance: Illustrated Short Answer Exercises

Most of the following questions begin with a short thematic introduction, and all include at least one image. Please note that some questions ask you to read a primary or secondary text that is not included in your anthology.

Political Drawings in The Messenger
The “economics and politics” drawing appeared as a banner over a number of articles written by The Messenger's founding editor, A. Philip Randolph. Randolph was a civil rights and labor leader committed to socialism and trade unionism. He believed that since most African Americans in his time belonged to the working class, the only way they could improve their civil and political rights was by first improving their economic situation through unionism and worker solidarity. The drawing represents his view that American workers should overcome their racial divisions and recognize their common class interests.
1. How would you describe the two classes depicted in the “economics and politics” drawing? What political or economic interests unite the members of each class? Do you agree or disagree with this portrait of America ? Why?

The second drawing appeared in the November 1919 issue of The Messenger. It represents "Negro Labor," "White Labor," and "Capital" as dogs fighting over a ham labeled "Profits." In the lower left corner an "agitator dog" says, "Drop that bone and get the ham. You are just working dogs!"

2. The only unlabeled item in this drawing is the bone. What do you think this represents, and why do you think the two "labor dogs" are fighting over it instead of the ham? What is the overall message of this drawing in less metaphorical terms?

The Messenger carried a number of appeals for racial solidarity as a first step toward effective labor unionism. This advertisement for "The National Association for the Promotion of Labor Unionism Among Negroes," from the February 1922 issue, is one example. The explicit argument of such appeals was that the owners of the means of production ("capitalist exploiters") would profit in some way if they could encourage racial animosities among workers.

3. How would owners benefit from the perpetuation of racial strife among workers? Do you find this a convincing argument? Is it as applicable to today's economic and racial climate as it might have been to that of the 1920s?

Submit to Gradebook:

First Name:
 
Last Name:
 
Your Email Address:
 
Your Professor's Email Address:
 

"I, Too, Sing America"
Plantation Labor
Print This Page
Bookmark and Share

American Passages

Visit our companion site, American Passages. Produced in conjunction with Oregon Public Broadcasting, this rich site includes an archive featuring over 3,000 images, audio clips, presentation software, and more.

Norton Literature Online

Norton/Write

The Norton Gradebook

Instructors and students now have an easy way to track online quiz scores with the Norton Gradebook.

Go to the Norton Gradebook