Patrick O'Brian Discussion Forum

Karl Moeller
mkarl2@qwest.net

>I'm not sure what "idiotic conspiracy theory" was offered.  

>If we're talking the threat of weapons of mass distruction (WMD), well Saddam decided to effectively deny inspections.  Once he did that the burden was on him to show he was not in the business of WMD or he risked action on our part.

>If you believe there were never any WMD, then the joke was on Saddam. Saddam bluffed and his bluff backfired. You can smartass the big guy on the block.  Sometimes it works.  Sometimes it ends up with you at the gallows.

I recall Hans Blix, UN inspector, clearly stating that in his in-country inspection team's opinion there were no WMD's in Iraq.  Two points - his teams were not denied access and if they were that would have been addressed in that dimly-recalled report.

Oh, Google!  good idea very first hit on Hans Blix WMD:

U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix faults Bush administration for lack of "critical thinking" in Iraq

By Bonnie Azab Powell, NewsCenter | 18 March 2004

 Webcast: "WMDs: Truth and Its Consequences" | 1 hr, 32 mins
BERKELEY – Speaking on the anniversary of the United States' invasion of Iraq, originally declared as a pre-emptive strike against a madman ready to deploy weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the man first charged with finding those weapons said that the U.S. government has "the same mind frame as the witch hunters of the past" — looking for evidence to support a foregone conclusion.

"There were about 700 inspections, and in no case did we find weapons of mass destruction," said Hans Blix, the Swedish diplomat called out of retirement to serve as the United Nations' chief weapons inspector from 2000 to 2003; from 1981 to 1997 he headed the International Atomic Energy Agency. "We went to sites [in Iraq] given to us by intelligence, and only in three cases did we find something" - a stash of nuclear documents, some Vulcan boosters, and several empty warheads for chemical weapons. More inspections were required to determine whether these findings were the "tip of the iceberg" or simply fragments remaining from that deadly iceberg's past destruction, Blix said he told the United Nations Security Council. However, his work in Iraq was cut short when the United States and the United Kingdom took disarmament into their own hands in March of last year.

Blix accused U.S. President George W. Bush and U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair of acting not in bad faith, but with a severe lack of "critical thinking." The United States and Britain failed to examine the sources of their primary intelligence - Iraqi defectors with their own agendas for encouraging regime change - with a skeptical eye, he alleged. In the buildup to the war, Saddam Hussein and the Iraqis were cooperating with U.N. inspections, and in February 2003 had provided Blix's team with the names of hundreds of scientists to interview, individuals Saddam claimed had been involved in the destruction of banned weapons. Had the inspections been allowed to continue, Blix said, there would likely be a very different situation in Iraq today. As it was, America's pre-emptive, unilateral actions "have bred more terrorism there and elsewhere."

berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/03/18_blix.shtml